Incorporation

Where to Incorporate Your AI, Crypto or Web3 Company

Where you incorporate shapes how you raise, issue a token, bank, list on exchanges, manage tax and deal with regulators. Getting it wrong means re-papering, restructuring, or finding out later that you crossed a regulatory line. GVRN forms and maintains companies across nine jurisdictions, and the six below have a guide each.

There is rarely a single best jurisdiction. Most Web3 projects run more than one entity: an onshore development company that hires and raises, and an offshore foundation or company that issues the token and holds governance. Each entity should suit the job it does.

Compare the jurisdictions at a glance

JurisdictionHeadline vehicleCorporate taxCrypto regimeBest for
SingaporePrivate limited (Pte. Ltd.)Low headline rate, exemptionsMAS: PSA + DTSP regime (in force Jun 2025)Credible operating HQ, funds, licensed activity, IP holding
BVIBVI Business Company0%VASP Act 2022; token issuers often out of scopeToken issuers, holding companies, funds
Cayman IslandsFoundation company0%VASP Act, CIMA; phase 2 licensing (Apr 2025)DAOs, protocols, often used for treasury or decentralised governance
PanamaPrivate interest foundation / S.A.Territorial (foreign income exempt) No VASP licence regime; AML/CFT rules apply (fintech bill pending)Foundations, DAOs, offshore operating entities
DelawareC-Corp / LLCUS federal + stateNo state crypto licence; federal rules applyUS DevCos, VC fundraising, IP, operating cos
Costa RicaS.R.L. (LLC)Territorial (foreign income exempt)No VASP licence; SUGEF registration required for AML purposesEarly-stage GameFi

Regulatory positions continue to evolve.

The jurisdictions in brief

Six of our nine jurisdictions, and the job each one is good at.

Singapore — the credible onshore hub

A Singapore Pte. Ltd. signals legitimacy to banks, exchanges and institutional investors. It's the jurisdiction of choice for regional headquarters, fund management and labs companies. The DTSP regime that took effect in June 2025 narrowed specific use cases, so Singapore rewards deliberate structuring over default offshore-style setups.

Read more

British Virgin Islands

The BVI Business Company has been one of the crypto industry's default offshore vehicles for over a decade: tax neutral, English common law, fast formation, internationally trusted. Under the VASP Act 2022, a token issuer often sits outside the registration regime, while exchange and custody activities are in scope.

Read more

Cayman Islands — the DAO and fund standard

The Cayman foundation company is the global standard for wrapping DAOs, protocols and token issuers in an ownerless legal entity, and Cayman's fund ecosystem is best-in-class. It's a premium, more demanding home — phase 2 of the VASP regime (April 2025) requires full licences for custody and trading platforms.

Read more

Panama — the flexible foundation option

Territorial tax and the private interest foundation make Panama an efficient base for protocols that want a foundation without Cayman's cost. There is no VASP licence regime, though AML/CFT rules apply and a fintech bill is before the National Assembly.

Read more

Costa Rica — the fast, affordable starting point

Territorial tax and quick formation make Costa Rica a practical launch jurisdiction for early-stage projects, often as a first step before pairing with or moving to a more institutional hub. Virtual asset service providers must register with SUGEF from September 2026.

Read more

How to choose — and why it's usually a combination

Three questions drive most decisions:

  • Where do you raise capital? US investors push toward Delaware. Singapore for an international investor base.
  • What does the token need? An ownerless issuer points to a Cayman or Panama foundation, or a BVI company limited by guarantee.
  • Where do you operate and bank? Singapore offers credibility; Costa Rica and Panama offer speed and territorial tax.

Few projects answer all three with one entity, which is exactly why the DevCo-plus-offshore entity pattern is so common. GVRN designs the whole structure so the pieces work together from day one, rather than forming entities one at a time and re-papering later.

Frequently asked questions

What's the best jurisdiction to incorporate a crypto company?
There's rarely a single best answer. The right structure usually combines an onshore operating/fundraising entity with an offshore token-issuance foundation, matched to your capital, token and operating needs.
Why do crypto projects use two entities?
A typical pattern separates the onshore development company (hires, holds IP, raises capital) from an offshore foundation (issues the token, holds governance). This keeps operations and token issuance cleanly distinct.
Which jurisdictions are zero-tax for crypto?
BVI and Cayman impose no corporate, capital gains or withholding tax. Panama and Costa Rica use territorial systems where properly documented foreign-source income is generally exempt. Singapore and Delaware are onshore tax regimes.
Can GVRN handle a multi-jurisdiction structure end to end?
Yes. We form and maintain entities across all nine jurisdictions and design how they fit together.

GVRN provides crypto-native incorporation and structuring across Singapore, BVI, Cayman Islands, Panama, Delaware and Costa Rica. This page is general information, not legal advice; regulatory positions continue to evolve.

Ready to incorporate?

Pick a jurisdiction and we handle the filings end to end. Not sure which one fits, or whether you need more than one? Talk to us first.

Start your Company